I've avoided featuring images of watermen or coastal fishermen because there are sartorial differences between them and bluewater sailors, but the lure of Turner was once again too much for me: not only does the Tate have Turner's original watercolor, but both the preliminary outline etching and the final published version of this print survive, with the final, published print engraved by a different artist.
Together these three images show subtle differences in the interpretation of the sailor's clothing in the scene, and a useful lesson on the over-reliance on an artist's brush-strokes or etching-lines when studying clothing.
JMW Turner; Marine Dabblers © Tate Photographic Rights © Tate (2016), CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 (Unported), The original can be viewed at the Tate by clicking here. 1808 |
Detail from JMW Turner's "Marine Dabblers" © Tate Photographic Rights © Tate (2016), CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 (Unported), The original can be viewed at the Tate by clicking here. 1808 |
JMW Turner; Marine Dabblers © Tate Photographic Rights © Tate (2016), CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 (Unported), The original can be viewed at the Tate by clicking here. 1811 |
Detail from JMW Turner's "Marine Dabblers" © Tate Photographic Rights © Tate (2016), CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 (Unported), The original can be viewed at the Tate by clicking here. 1811 |
JMW Turner; Marine Dabblers © Tate Photographic Rights © Tate (2016), CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 (Unported), The original can be viewed at the Tate by clicking here. 1811 |
Detail from JMW Turner's "Marine Dabblers" © Tate Photographic Rights © Tate (2016), CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 (Unported), The original can be viewed at the Tate by clicking here. 1811 |
Although this post is perhaps not extremely interesting from the perspective of the costume historian, I nonetheless enjoyed seeing Turner's artistic process, especially when the process gives me insight into studying sailor's clothing in art.
I'd humbly suggest these fishermen are wearing seaboots and not simply gaiters. As always, visual depictions are tricky (as you have brilliantly showed here!), but there's certainly a fair bit of textual evidence to support this - especially Nicolas Denys (1598-1688), Histoire Naturelle...de l'Amerique Septentrionale... Vol. 2 (Paris, 1672). pp. 74-76 [via University of Alberta], and Henri-Louis Duhamel du Monceau, Traité Général des Pesches et Histoire des Possions, Vol. 2 (Paris, 1772), Sect. 3, p. 366. Such boots sometimes have cuffs, often not, and were necessary for fishermen's work in small craft on beaches which often lacked harbors until later development in the 19th century. Make-do versions of boots such as boot-clogs and leg wraps seem to have been prevalent on the continent, but were certainly looked down on as a sign of foreigness and poverty - just my two cents here.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for the clarification and the references! This is a new garment that I haven't encountered before and I didn't know what I was looking at, so the background is much appreciated. Do you think that the preliminary engraving is showing seaboots secured at the top with a strap, then?
ReplyDeleteI don't know anything about fishermen's clothing or exactly how it differed from sailor's clothing - do you have any other insights to the men's clothing that marks them as fishermen?